Who is better, Larsson or Chadwick?
Gunnar Larsson leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for Michael Chadwick — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gunnar Larsson and Michael Chadwick level at 81.6. Gunnar Larsson leads on Dominance, Peak. Michael Chadwick leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Larsson wins: Dominance, Peak
Chadwick wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gunnar-larsson-swim-vs-michael-chadwick
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Larsson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| 🇺🇸 Chadwick | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 358 | 610 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LarssonRetired | ChadwickRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship golds | 4 | — |
| World records | 3 | — |
| Olympic finals | 4 | — |
| Swedish records | 30 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Pan American medals | — | 2 |
| NCAA All-America honours | — | 8 |
| United States titles | — | 2 |
| Relay finals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Gunnar Larsson leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.6 for Michael Chadwick — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chadwick scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Larsson leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Larsson: 81.6, Chadwick: 81.6.
Make your case for Larsson vs Chadwick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.