Who is better, Carbonneau or Knight?
Guy Carbonneau leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Hilary Knight — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Guy Carbonneau and Hilary Knight level at 85.4. Guy Carbonneau leads on Honours, Peak, Longevity. Hilary Knight leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carbonneau wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Knight wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/guy-carbonneau-vs-hilary-knight
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carbonneau leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Carbonneau | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 | 276 |
| 🇺🇸 Knight | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 138 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarbonneauRetired | KnightActive |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 3 | — |
| Selke Trophies | 3 | — |
| NHL games played | 1,318 | — |
| Career points | 663 | — |
| Playoff games | 231 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 9 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship points | — | 100 |
| USA caps | — | 200 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Guy Carbonneau leads with a GOAT score of 85.4 against 85.4 for Hilary Knight — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Knight scores higher on dominance, statistics. Carbonneau leads on peak, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carbonneau: 85.4, Knight: 85.4.
Make your case for Carbonneau vs Knight. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.