Who is better, Chouinard or Mrázová?
Katarína Mrázová leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.2 for Guy Chouinard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katarína Mrázová above Guy Chouinard: 77.3 vs 77.2. Katarína Mrázová leads on Longevity. Guy Chouinard leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mrázová wins: Longevity
Chouinard wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/guy-chouinard-vs-katarina-mrazova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mrázová leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Chouinard | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 242 | 574 |
| 🇸🇰 Mrázová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 36 | 144 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChouinardRetired | MrázováActive |
|---|---|---|
| Career points | 600 | — |
| Best season goals | 50 | — |
| All-Star selections | 1 | — |
| NHL games played | 578 | — |
| Career assists | 370 | — |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 10 |
| Slovakia caps | — | 130 |
| European Women's Champions Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career club points | — | 300 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Katarína Mrázová leads with a GOAT score of 77.3 against 77.2 for Guy Chouinard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chouinard scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Mrázová leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chouinard: 77.2, Mrázová: 77.3.
Make your case for Chouinard vs Mrázová. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.