Who is better, Chouinard or Rhéaume?
Guy Chouinard leads with a GOAT score of 77.2 against 76.3 for Manon Rhéaume — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Guy Chouinard above Manon Rhéaume: 77.2 vs 76.3. Guy Chouinard leads on Statistics, Longevity. Manon Rhéaume leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chouinard wins: Longevity, Statistics
Rhéaume wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/guy-chouinard-vs-manon-rheaume
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chouinard leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Chouinard | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 242 | 574 |
| 🇨🇦 Rhéaume | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 41 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChouinardRetired | RhéaumeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career points | 600 | — |
| Best season goals | 50 | — |
| All-Star selections | 1 | — |
| NHL games played | 578 | — |
| Career assists | 370 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| NHL exhibition games | — | 2 |
| Professional men's league games | — | 24 |
| Canada caps | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 76 |
Guy Chouinard leads with a GOAT score of 77.2 against 76.3 for Manon Rhéaume — a gap of 0.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rhéaume scores higher on dominance, honours. Chouinard leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chouinard: 77.2, Rhéaume: 76.3.
Make your case for Chouinard vs Rhéaume. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.