Who is better, Loob or Fedorov?
Håkan Loob leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.9 for Sergei Fedorov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Loob vs Fedorov
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Håkan Loob and Sergei Fedorov level at 84.9. Håkan Loob leads on Honours, Peak. Sergei Fedorov leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LoobWinner
84.9Loob wins: Peak, Honours
Fedorov
84.9Fedorov wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/hakan-loob-vs-sergei-fedorov
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Håkan Loob
84.9
Loob leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Håkan Loob
2. Sergei Fedorov
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇷🇺 Sergei Fedorov5 seasons played · career day 3,286422 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Håkan Loob5 seasons played · career day 2,191212 points
-49.8% vs Fedorov at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Loob | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 166 | 416 |
| 🇷🇺 Fedorov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 422 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Loob84.9
Fedorov84.9
FAQ
Where does Fedorov beat Loob?
Fedorov scores higher on longevity. Loob leads on peak, honours.
How is the Loob vs Fedorov score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Loob: 84.9, Fedorov: 84.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Loob vs Fedorov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.