Who is better, Hakeem or Stockton?
Hakeem Olajuwon leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.2 for John Stockton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hakeem Olajuwon above John Stockton: 88.3 vs 88.2. Hakeem Olajuwon leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. John Stockton leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hakeem wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Stockton wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/hakeem-vs-john-stockton
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hakeem leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇬 Hakeem | 0 | 0 | 20.6 | 44.1 | 90.3 | 208.3 |
| 🇺🇸 Stockton | 0 | 0 | 5.1 | 12.5 | 34.5 | 102.5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HakeemRetired | StocktonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 2 | — |
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Finals MVP | 2 | — |
| All-Star selections | 12 | 10 |
| Career blocks | 3,830 | — |
| Career points | 26,946 | — |
| Career assists | — | 15,806 |
| Career steals | — | 3,265 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Assist titles | — | 9 |
| Games played | — | 1,504 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 91 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 87 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 96 |
Hakeem Olajuwon leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.2 for John Stockton — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stockton scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hakeem leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hakeem: 88.3, Stockton: 88.2.
Make your case for Hakeem vs Stockton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.