Who is better, Häkkinen or Moss?
Stirling Moss leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 79.5 for Mika Häkkinen — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Stirling Moss above Mika Häkkinen: 80.3 vs 79.5. Stirling Moss leads on Dominance, Peak, Longevity. Mika Häkkinen leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Moss wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Häkkinen wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/hakkinen-vs-stirling-moss
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Moss leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 Häkkinen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 🇬🇧 Moss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Stirling Moss leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 79.5 for Mika Häkkinen — a gap of 0.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Häkkinen scores higher on honours. Moss leads on peak, dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Häkkinen: 79.5, Moss: 80.3.
Make your case for Häkkinen vs Moss. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.