Who is better, Washington or Colaci?
Haleigh Washington leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Massimo Colaci — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Haleigh Washington above Massimo Colaci: 78.7 vs 78.6. Haleigh Washington leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Massimo Colaci leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Washington wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Colaci wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/haleigh-washington-vs-massimo-colaci
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Washington leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Washington | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 389 | 729 |
| 🇮🇹 Colaci | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 240 | 664 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WashingtonActive | ColaciActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | 1 |
| NCAA titles | 1 | — |
| Years with the national team | 8 | — |
| World League titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Italian league titles | — | 2 |
| Years at the top level | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 76 |
Haleigh Washington leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Massimo Colaci — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Colaci scores higher on longevity. Washington leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Washington: 78.7, Colaci: 78.6.
Make your case for Washington vs Colaci. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.