Who is better, Hamilton or R. Schumacher?
Lewis Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 96.1 against 73.8 for Ralf Schumacher — a gap of 22.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lewis Hamilton above Ralf Schumacher: 96.1 vs 73.8. Lewis Hamilton leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hamilton wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
R. Schumacher wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/hamilton-vs-ralf-schumacher
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hamilton leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for R. Schumacher — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HamiltonActive | R. SchumacherRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 7 | — |
| Race wins | 105 | — |
| Pole positions | 104 | 6 |
| Podiums | 202 | 27 |
| Fastest laps | 67 | — |
| Win rate | 29.9% | — |
| Grand Prix wins | — | 6 |
| Best championship finish | — | 4 |
| Grand Prix starts | — | 180 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 80 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteLewis Hamilton leads with a GOAT score of 96.1 against 73.8 for Ralf Schumacher — a gap of 22.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
R. Schumacher does not lead any of the five categories; Hamilton is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hamilton: 96.1, R. Schumacher: 73.8.
Make your case for Hamilton vs R. Schumacher. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.