Who is better, Luisetti or Harris?
Lusia Harris leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.3 for Hank Luisetti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lusia Harris above Hank Luisetti: 81.4 vs 81.3. Lusia Harris leads on Honours, Longevity, Statistics. Hank Luisetti leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Harris wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Luisetti wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/hank-luisetti-vs-lusia-harris
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Harris leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Luisetti | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.3 | 62.6 | 62.6 |
| 🇺🇸 Harris | 0 | 0 | 60 | 132 | 396 | 528 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LuisettiRetired | HarrisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| College All-America selections | 3 | — |
| College player of the year awards | 2 | — |
| Single-game points record | 50 | — |
| College career points | 1,596 | — |
| Seasons played | 4 | 7 |
| National college titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| College points per game | — | 25.9 |
| College rebounds per game | — | 14.4 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 58 | 60 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Lusia Harris leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.3 for Hank Luisetti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Luisetti scores higher on peak, dominance. Harris leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Luisetti: 81.3, Harris: 81.4.
Make your case for Luisetti vs Harris. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.