Who is better, Ljungberg or Modrić?
Hanna Ljungberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.3 for Luka Modrić — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Hanna Ljungberg and Luka Modrić level at 87.3. Hanna Ljungberg leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Luka Modrić leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ljungberg wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Modrić wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/hanna-ljungberg-v-vs-modric
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ljungberg leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Ljungberg | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 254 | 687 |
| 🇭🇷 Modrić | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LjungbergRetired | ModrićActive · AC Milan |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 130 | — |
| Sweden goals | 72 | — |
| Damallsvenskan titles | 5 | — |
| World Cup finals | 1 | — |
| Damallsvenskan goals | 130 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 6 |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 1 |
| La Liga titles | — | 4 |
| World Cup medals | — | 2 |
| Croatia caps | — | 190 |
| Club World Cups | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 85 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 89 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 84 |
Hanna Ljungberg leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.3 for Luka Modrić — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Modrić scores higher on honours, longevity. Ljungberg leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ljungberg: 87.3, Modrić: 87.3.
Make your case for Ljungberg vs Modrić. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.