Who is better, Day or Johnson?
Hap Day leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.8 for Tom Johnson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Day vs Johnson
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Hap Day and Tom Johnson level at 83.8. Hap Day leads on Dominance, Statistics. Tom Johnson leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DayWinner
83.8Day wins: Dominance, Statistics
Johnson
83.8Johnson wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/hap-day-vs-tom-johnson
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Hap Day
83.8
Day leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Hap Day
2. Tom Johnson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Hap Day5 seasons played · career day 1,826323 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Tom Johnson5 seasons played · career day 1,825269 points
-16.7% vs Day at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Day | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 249 | 667 |
| 🇨🇦 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 269 | 565 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Day83.8
Johnson83.8
FAQ
Where does Johnson beat Day?
Johnson scores higher on honours. Day leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Day vs Johnson score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Day: 83.8, Johnson: 83.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Day vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.