Who is better, Aikines-Aryeetey or Ali?
Nia Ali leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.9 for Harry Aikines-Aryeetey — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Nia Ali above Harry Aikines-Aryeetey: 81.0 vs 80.9. Nia Ali leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Harry Aikines-Aryeetey leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ali wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Aikines-Aryeetey wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/harry-aikines-aryeetey-vs-nia-ali
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ali leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Aikines-Aryeetey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.4 | 41.15 | 81.69 |
| 🇺🇸 Ali | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 351 | 673 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Aikines-AryeeteyRetired | AliActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| European medals | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth medals | 2 | — |
| 100 m best | 10.08 | — |
| World Youth titles | 2 | — |
| World outdoor titles | — | 1 |
| World indoor titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best (s) | — | 12.34 |
| Global finals contested | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 80 |
Nia Ali leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.9 for Harry Aikines-Aryeetey — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Aikines-Aryeetey scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ali leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Aikines-Aryeetey: 80.9, Ali: 81.0.
Make your case for Aikines-Aryeetey vs Ali. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.