Who is better, Brook or Boyce?
Harry Brook leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Keith Boyce — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Harry Brook above Keith Boyce: 83.2 vs 83.1. Harry Brook leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Keith Boyce leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brook wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Boyce wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/harry-brook-vs-keith-boyce
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brook leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Brook | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 675 |
| 🇧🇧 Boyce | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 279 | 601 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrookActive | BoyceRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test centuries | 9 | — |
| Test runs | 2,500 | 657 |
| Test average | 56 | — |
| Player of the Series awards | 3 | — |
| Twenty20 international runs | 900 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Wickets in the 1975 final | — | 4 |
| Test wickets | — | 60 |
| First-class wickets | — | 852 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Harry Brook leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Keith Boyce — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boyce scores higher on honours, longevity. Brook leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brook: 83.2, Boyce: 83.1.
Make your case for Brook vs Boyce. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.