Who is better, Brook or Adcock?
Harry Brook leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.2 for Neil Adcock — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Harry Brook and Neil Adcock level at 83.2. Harry Brook leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Neil Adcock leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brook wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Adcock wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/harry-brook-vs-neil-adcock
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brook leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Brook | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 675 |
| 🇿🇦 Adcock | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 222 | 640 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BrookActive | AdcockRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test centuries | 9 | — |
| Test runs | 2,500 | — |
| Test average | 56 | 21 |
| Player of the Series awards | 3 | — |
| Twenty20 international runs | 900 | — |
| Test wickets | — | 104 |
| First-class wickets | — | 405 |
| Five-wicket hauls in Tests | — | 5 |
| Tests played | — | 26 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Harry Brook leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.2 for Neil Adcock — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adcock scores higher on longevity. Brook leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brook: 83.2, Adcock: 83.2.
Make your case for Brook vs Adcock. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.