Who is better, Gallatin or Timms?
Harry Gallatin leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.4 for Michele Timms — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gallatin vs Timms
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Harry Gallatin and Michele Timms level at 79.4. Harry Gallatin leads on Statistics, Peak. Michele Timms leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GallatinWinner
79.4Gallatin wins: Peak, Statistics
Timms
79.4Timms wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/harry-gallatin-vs-michele-timms
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Harry Gallatin
79.4
Gallatin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Harry Gallatin
2. Michele Timms
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Harry Gallatin5 seasons played · career day 1,826349 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Michele Timms5 seasons played · career day 1,826310 points per game
-11.2% vs Gallatin at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gallatin | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 264 | 661 |
| 🇦🇺 Timms | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 236 | 646 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GallatinRetired | TimmsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| Rebounding titles | 1 | — |
| Consecutive games played | 682 | — |
| Career rebounds | 5,935 | — |
| Seasons played | 10 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| WNBA All-Star selections | — | 2 |
| Australia caps | — | 200 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 78 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gallatin79.4
Timms79.4
FAQ
Where does Timms beat Gallatin?
Timms scores higher on longevity. Gallatin leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Gallatin vs Timms score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gallatin: 79.4, Timms: 79.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gallatin vs Timms. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.