GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Gallatin vs Timms

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GallatinWinner
79.4

Gallatin wins: Peak, Statistics

Timms
79.4

Timms wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Basketball

Shareable URL · /compare/harry-gallatin-vs-michele-timms

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Harry Gallatin
79.4

Gallatin leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Seven-time All-Star who led the NBA in rebounding in 1954.

1. Harry Gallatin
79.4
2. Michele Timms
79.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per game

Career timeline · Points per game

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per game
1. 🇺🇸 Harry Gallatin5 seasons played · career day 1,826349 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Michele Timms5 seasons played · career day 1,826310 points per game
-11.2% vs Gallatin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Gallatin0055117264661
🇦🇺 Timms0050106236646

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricGallatinRetiredTimmsRetired
All-Star selections7
Rebounding titles1
Consecutive games played682
Career rebounds5,935
Seasons played10
Olympic medals2
World Championship medals2
WNBA All-Star selections2
Australia caps200
Olympic Games contested3
Dominance w25%7474
Peak w20%8684
Longevity w20%7684
Honours w20%7878
Statistics w15%8678

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Gallatin79.4
Timms79.4
The people
Gallatin
Timms

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Gallatin vs Timms. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →