AthletesTeams
Greb vs Sutcliffe
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Cross-sport verdictgoatrank.world
GrebWinner
88.6Greb wins: Dominance, Honours
Sutcliffe
87.7Sutcliffe wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/harry-greb-vs-herbert-sutcliffe
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Cross-sport GOAT score
🇺🇸 Harry Greb
87.7
91.4 in-sport × 0.96 Global participation & competition depth
Greb leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Harry Grebdepth ×0.96
2. Herbert Sutcliffedepth ×0.94
Category breakdown
Season form · season output
Career timeline · season output
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · season output1. 🇬🇧 Herbert Sutcliffe5 seasons played · career day 3,652322 output
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Harry Greb5 seasons played · career day 1,825292 output
-9.3% vs Sutcliffe at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Greb | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 292 | 644 |
| 🇬🇧 Sutcliffe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrebRetired | SutcliffeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 98 |
| Professional bouts | 298 | — |
| Professional wins | 261 | — |
| World titles | 1 | — |
| Title defences | 6 | — |
| Bouts in a single year | 45 | — |
| Test average | — | 60.73 |
| Test runs | — | 4,555 |
| Test centuries | — | 16 |
| First-class runs | — | 50,138 |
| First-class centuries | — | 151 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Greb88.6
Sutcliffe87.7
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Greb vs Sutcliffe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.