Who is better, Greb or Sutcliffe?
Harry Greb leads with a cross-sport score of 87.7 against 85.4 for Herbert Sutcliffe — a gap of 2.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Harry Greb above Herbert Sutcliffe: 87.7 vs 85.4. Harry Greb leads on Honours, Dominance. Herbert Sutcliffe leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Greb wins: Dominance, Honours
Sutcliffe wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/harry-greb-vs-herbert-sutcliffe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
91.4 in-sport × 0.96 Global participation & competition depth
Greb leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Greb | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 292 | 644 |
| 🇬🇧 Sutcliffe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrebRetired | SutcliffeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 98 |
| Professional bouts | 298 | — |
| Professional wins | 261 | — |
| World titles | 1 | — |
| Title defences | 6 | — |
| Bouts in a single year | 45 | — |
| Test average | — | 60.73 |
| Test runs | — | 4,555 |
| Test centuries | — | 16 |
| First-class runs | — | 50,138 |
| First-class centuries | — | 151 |
Harry Greb leads with a cross-sport score of 87.7 against 85.4 for Herbert Sutcliffe — a gap of 2.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sutcliffe scores higher on statistics, longevity. Greb leads on dominance, honours.
Each in-sport GOAT score is multiplied by Competition Depth: Greb 0.96 (boxing) and Sutcliffe 0.94 (cricket). Deeper, more global sports keep more of their score.
Make your case for Greb vs Sutcliffe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.