Who is better, Benhassi or Belova?
Irina Belova leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Hasna Benhassi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Irina Belova above Hasna Benhassi: 83.3 vs 83.2. Irina Belova leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Hasna Benhassi leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Belova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Benhassi wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/hasna-benhassi-vs-irina-belova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Belova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇦 Benhassi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 47 |
| 🇷🇺 Belova | 0 | 0 | 45 | 107 | 373 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BenhassiRetired | BelovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World indoor titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| 800 m personal best in seconds | 116.27 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| World Indoor titles | — | 1 |
| Heptathlon personal best | — | 6,845 |
| European medals | — | 1 |
| National titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Irina Belova leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Hasna Benhassi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Benhassi scores higher on longevity. Belova leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Benhassi: 83.2, Belova: 83.3.
Make your case for Benhassi vs Belova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.