GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Matthews vs Akram

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MatthewsWinner
87.6

Matthews wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics

Akram
87.4

Akram wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/hayley-matthews-vs-wasim-akram

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Hayley Matthews
87.6

Matthews leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Player of the match in the 2016 T20 World Cup final and the world's leading T20 all-rounder.

1. Hayley Matthews
87.6
2. Wasim Akram
87.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Wasim Akram5 years played · career day 2,556257 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Hayley Matthews5 years played · career day 1,825178 runs
-30.7% vs Akram at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴 Matthews002252178400
🇵🇰 Akram000085393

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMatthewsActiveAkramRetired
T20 World Cup titles1
T20I runs3,000
T20I wickets120
ODI centuries6
Career best T20I ranking1
Test wickets414
ODI wickets502
World Cups1
Five-wicket hauls25
Test bowling average23.62
ODI hat-tricks2
Dominance w25%8686
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%8088
Honours w20%8684
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Matthews87.6
Akram87.4
The people
Matthews
Akram

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Matthews vs Akram. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →