GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Matthews vs Yuvraj

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MatthewsWinner
87.6

Matthews wins: Dominance, Statistics

Yuvraj
87.5

Yuvraj wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/hayley-matthews-vs-yuvraj-singh

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Hayley Matthews
87.6

Matthews leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Player of the match in the 2016 T20 World Cup final and the world's leading T20 all-rounder.

1. Hayley Matthews
87.6
2. Yuvraj Singh
87.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇮🇳 Yuvraj Singh5 years played · career day 2,191202 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Hayley Matthews5 years played · career day 1,825178 runs
-11.9% vs Yuvraj at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴 Matthews002252178400
🇮🇳 Yuvraj00030108342

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMatthewsActiveYuvrajRetired
T20 World Cup titles11
T20I runs3,000
T20I wickets120
ODI centuries6
Career best T20I ranking1
World Cup titles1
ODI runs8,701
ODI wickets111
Sixes in one T20 over6
Dominance w25%8682
Peak w20%9496
Longevity w20%8082
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%9492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Matthews87.6
Yuvraj87.5
The people
Matthews
Yuvraj

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Matthews vs Yuvraj. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →