Who is better, Wickenheiser or Messier?
Hayley Wickenheiser leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Mark Messier — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hayley Wickenheiser above Mark Messier: 88.8 vs 88.7. Hayley Wickenheiser leads on Dominance, Peak. Mark Messier leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wickenheiser wins: Dominance, Peak
Messier wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/hayley-wickenheiser-vs-messier
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wickenheiser leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Wickenheiser | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 88 |
| 🇨🇦 Messier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 302 | 671 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WickenheiserRetired | MessierRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 5 | — |
| World Championship golds | 7 | — |
| Olympic MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Canada caps | 276 | — |
| Stanley Cups | — | 6 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 2 |
| NHL points | — | 1,887 |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | — | 1 |
| NHL goals | — | 694 |
| All-Star selections | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Hayley Wickenheiser leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.7 for Mark Messier — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Messier scores higher on longevity. Wickenheiser leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wickenheiser: 88.8, Messier: 88.7.
Make your case for Wickenheiser vs Messier. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.