Who is better, Camacho or Gans?
Joe Gans leads with a GOAT score of 91.2 against 89.6 for Héctor Camacho — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Camacho vs Gans
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joe Gans above Héctor Camacho: 91.2 vs 89.6. Joe Gans leads on Dominance, Peak. Héctor Camacho leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GansWinner
91.2Gans wins: Dominance, Peak
Camacho
89.6Camacho wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/hector-camacho-vs-joe-gans
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Joe Gans
91.2
Gans leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Joe Gans
2. Héctor Camacho
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇷 Héctor Camacho5 years played · career day 1,826312 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Joe Gans5 years played · career day 1,825249 title wins
-20.2% vs Camacho at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇷 Camacho | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 682 |
| 🇺🇸 Gans | 0 | 0 | 40 | 85 | 249 | 535 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gans91.2
Camacho89.6
FAQ
Where does Camacho beat Gans?
Camacho scores higher on longevity. Gans leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Camacho vs Gans score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Camacho: 89.6, Gans: 91.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Camacho vs Gans. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.