Who is better, Kovalainen or Scarfiotti?
Heikki Kovalainen leads with a GOAT score of 69.4 against 69.3 for Ludovico Scarfiotti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Heikki Kovalainen above Ludovico Scarfiotti: 69.4 vs 69.3. Heikki Kovalainen leads on Longevity. Ludovico Scarfiotti leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kovalainen wins: Longevity
Scarfiotti wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/heikki-kovalainen-vs-ludovico-scarfiotti
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kovalainen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇮 Kovalainen | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 🇮🇹 Scarfiotti | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KovalainenRetired | ScarfiottiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix wins | 1 | 1 |
| Podiums | 4 | 2 |
| Pole positions | 1 | — |
| Grand Prix starts | 111 | 10 |
| Best championship finish | 7 | — |
| European Hillclimb titles | — | 2 |
| Le Mans wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 60 | 62 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteHeikki Kovalainen leads with a GOAT score of 69.4 against 69.3 for Ludovico Scarfiotti — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Scarfiotti scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Kovalainen leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kovalainen: 69.4, Scarfiotti: 69.3.
Make your case for Kovalainen vs Scarfiotti. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.