Who is better, Wills Moody or Lawford?
Helen Wills Moody leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 84.1 for Herbert Lawford — a gap of 6.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Helen Wills Moody above Herbert Lawford: 90.5 vs 84.1. Helen Wills Moody leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Herbert Lawford leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wills Moody wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Lawford wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/helen-wills-moody-vs-herbert-lawford
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wills Moody leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Wills Moody | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 🇬🇧 Lawford | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 626 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Wills MoodyRetired | LawfordRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 19 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | 8 | 1 |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| US Championships titles | 7 | — |
| Career singles titles | 100 | — |
| Wimbledon finals | — | 6 |
| Irish Championships titles | — | 3 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Topspin forehand pioneer | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Helen Wills Moody leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 84.1 for Herbert Lawford — a gap of 6.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lawford scores higher on longevity. Wills Moody leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wills Moody: 90.5, Lawford: 84.1.
Make your case for Wills Moody vs Lawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.