GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Avdyeyenko vs Coleman

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AvdyeyenkoWinner
83.5

Avdyeyenko wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics

Coleman
83.5

Coleman wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/hennadiy-avdyeyenko-vs-christian-coleman

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇦 Hennadiy Avdyeyenko
83.5

Avdyeyenko leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic high jump champion in 1988 with an Olympic record of 2.38 m.

1. Hennadiy Avdyeyenko
83.5
2. Christian Coleman
83.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇺🇦 Hennadiy Avdyeyenko5 seasons played · career day 1,82511.7 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Christian Coleman5 seasons played · career day 1,8268 major golds
-31.6% vs Avdyeyenko at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇦 Avdyeyenko002.324.6611.6820.97
🇺🇸 Coleman0013814

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAvdyeyenkoRetiredColemanActive
Olympic golds1
World Championship golds14
High jump best2.38
European indoor titles1
Olympic records1
60 m world record6.34
100 m personal best9.76
World indoor titles2
NCAA titles4
Dominance w25%8084
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7274
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%9086

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Avdyeyenko83.5
Coleman83.5
The people
Avdyeyenko
Coleman

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Avdyeyenko vs Coleman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →