Who is better, Avdyeyenko or Holmes?
Kelly Holmes leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for Hennadiy Avdyeyenko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kelly Holmes above Hennadiy Avdyeyenko: 83.6 vs 83.5. Kelly Holmes leads on Longevity, Dominance. Hennadiy Avdyeyenko leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Holmes wins: Dominance, Longevity
Avdyeyenko wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/hennadiy-avdyeyenko-vs-kelly-holmes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Holmes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇦 Avdyeyenko | 0 | 0 | 2.32 | 4.66 | 11.68 | 20.97 |
| 🇬🇧 Holmes | 0 | 0 | 70 | 148 | 394 | 706 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AvdyeyenkoRetired | HolmesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| High jump best | 2.38 | — |
| European indoor titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic records | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Commonwealth Games golds | — | 2 |
| British record 800 m | — | 1.563 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Kelly Holmes leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for Hennadiy Avdyeyenko — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Avdyeyenko scores higher on statistics. Holmes leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Avdyeyenko: 83.5, Holmes: 83.6.
Make your case for Avdyeyenko vs Holmes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.