Who is better, Larsson or Buchanan?
Kadeisha Buchanan leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Henrik Larsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kadeisha Buchanan above Henrik Larsson: 87.6 vs 87.5. Kadeisha Buchanan leads on Honours, Dominance. Henrik Larsson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Buchanan wins: Dominance, Honours
Larsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/henrik-larsson-vs-kadeisha-buchanan-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Buchanan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 231 | 638 |
| 🇨🇦 Buchanan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 325 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LarssonRetired | BuchananActive |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 1 | 4 |
| Scottish league titles | 4 | — |
| European Golden Shoe awards | 1 | — |
| Career goals | 415 | — |
| Sweden goals | 37 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| French league titles | — | 4 |
| Canada caps | — | 130 |
| World Cup Best Young Player awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Kadeisha Buchanan leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Henrik Larsson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Larsson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Buchanan leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Larsson: 87.5, Buchanan: 87.6.
Make your case for Larsson vs Buchanan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.