Who is better, Lundqvist or Martin?
Henrik Lundqvist leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Kim Martin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Henrik Lundqvist above Kim Martin: 84.5 vs 84.4. Henrik Lundqvist leads on Longevity, Honours. Kim Martin leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lundqvist wins: Longevity, Honours
Martin wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/henrik-lundqvist-vs-kim-martin-hasson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lundqvist leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Lundqvist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142 |
| 🇸🇪 Martin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 36 | 89 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LundqvistRetired | MartinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 459 | — |
| Vezina Trophies | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Shutouts | 64 | — |
| Save percentage | 0.918 | — |
| All-Star selections | 5 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Sweden caps | — | 130 |
| Olympic best-goaltender awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Henrik Lundqvist leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Kim Martin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Martin scores higher on peak, statistics. Lundqvist leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lundqvist: 84.5, Martin: 84.4.
Make your case for Lundqvist vs Martin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.