Who is better, Jordan or Riggins?
Henry Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for John Riggins — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Henry Jordan and John Riggins level at 87.1. Henry Jordan leads on Honours, Dominance. John Riggins leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jordan wins: Dominance, Honours
Riggins wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/henry-jordan-vs-john-riggins
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jordan leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jordan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 314 | 664 |
| 🇺🇸 Riggins | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 272 | 572 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Henry Jordan leads with a GOAT score of 87.1 against 87.1 for John Riggins — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Riggins scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Jordan leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jordan: 87.1, Riggins: 87.1.
Make your case for Jordan vs Riggins. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.