Who is better, Sutcliffe or Kohli?
Herbert Sutcliffe leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.8 for Virat Kohli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Herbert Sutcliffe and Virat Kohli level at 90.8. Herbert Sutcliffe leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Virat Kohli leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sutcliffe wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Kohli wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/herbert-sutcliffe-vs-kohli
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sutcliffe leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Sutcliffe — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SutcliffeRetired | KohliActive · Royal Challengers Bengaluru |
|---|---|---|
| Test average | 60.73 | — |
| Test runs | 4,555 | 9,230 |
| Test centuries | 16 | — |
| First-class runs | 50,138 | — |
| First-class centuries | 151 | — |
| Test batting average | — | 46.85 |
| International centuries | — | 82 |
| ODI runs | — | 14,181 |
| World Cups | — | 2 |
| ODI average | — | 57.7 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 95 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 98 | 96 |
Herbert Sutcliffe leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.8 for Virat Kohli — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kohli scores higher on dominance, honours. Sutcliffe leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sutcliffe: 90.8, Kohli: 90.8.
Make your case for Sutcliffe vs Kohli. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.