Who is better, Sutcliffe or Hayden?
Herbert Sutcliffe leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.4 for Matthew Hayden — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Herbert Sutcliffe above Matthew Hayden: 90.8 vs 90.4. Herbert Sutcliffe leads on Longevity, Dominance, Statistics. Matthew Hayden leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sutcliffe wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
Hayden wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/herbert-sutcliffe-vs-matthew-hayden
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sutcliffe leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Sutcliffe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 264 |
| 🇦🇺 Hayden | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 219 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Herbert Sutcliffe leads with a GOAT score of 90.8 against 90.4 for Matthew Hayden — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hayden scores higher on honours. Sutcliffe leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sutcliffe: 90.8, Hayden: 90.4.
Make your case for Sutcliffe vs Hayden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.