Who is better, Gibbs or Blundell?
Herschelle Gibbs leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Tom Blundell — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gibbs vs Blundell
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Herschelle Gibbs and Tom Blundell level at 83.0. Herschelle Gibbs leads on Peak, Longevity. Tom Blundell leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GibbsWinner
83.0Gibbs wins: Peak, Longevity
Blundell
83.0Blundell wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/herschelle-gibbs-vs-tom-blundell
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Herschelle Gibbs
83.0
Gibbs leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Herschelle Gibbs
2. Tom Blundell
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Tom Blundell5 years played · career day 1,825285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Herschelle Gibbs5 years played · career day 2,191190 runs
-33.3% vs Blundell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Gibbs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 98 | 318 |
| 🇳🇿 Blundell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 285 | 621 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gibbs83.0
Blundell83.0
FAQ
Where does Blundell beat Gibbs?
Blundell scores higher on honours. Gibbs leads on peak, longevity.
How is the Gibbs vs Blundell score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gibbs: 83.0, Blundell: 83.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gibbs vs Blundell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.