GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hayata vs Chuang

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HayataWinner
80.2

Hayata wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Chuang
80.0

Chuang wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/hina-hayata-vs-chuang-chih-yuan

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Hina Hayata
80.2

Hayata leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic singles bronze medallist in Paris 2024 and a world top-five player.

1. Hina Hayata
80.2
2. Chuang Chih-yuan
80.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Hina Hayata5 seasons played · career day 1,826353 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇹🇼 Chuang Chih-yuan5 seasons played · career day 1,826336 titles
-4.8% vs Hayata at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Hayata0055119269719
🇹🇼 Chuang0054114256676

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHayataActiveChuangActive
Olympic medals2
World Championship medals22
Japanese national titles2
WTT titles4
Career high world ranking4
Olympic Games contested6
World Tour titles8
Asian Games golds1
Best world ranking3
Dominance w25%7872
Peak w20%8884
Longevity w20%7292
Honours w20%8274
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hayata80.2
Chuang80.0
The people
Hayata
Chuang

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hayata vs Chuang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →