GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ward vs Lawford

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WardWinner
84.2

Ward wins: Dominance, Honours

Lawford
84.1

Lawford wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/holcombe-ward-vs-herbert-lawford

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Holcombe Ward
84.2

Ward leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. US champion in 1904 and six-time US doubles winner credited with the American twist serve.

1. Holcombe Ward
84.2
2. Herbert Lawford
84.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Holcombe Ward5 seasons played · career day 1,824353 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Herbert Lawford5 seasons played · career day 1,825300 titles
-15.0% vs Ward at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Ward0055118353562
🇬🇧 Lawford0050105300626

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWardRetiredLawfordRetired
US singles titles1
US doubles titles6
Davis Cup titles3
Seasons played816
Wimbledon doubles titles1
Wimbledon titles1
Wimbledon finals6
Irish Championships titles3
Topspin forehand pioneer1
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%7684
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ward84.2
Lawford84.1
The people
Ward
Lawford

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ward vs Lawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →