Who is better, Ward or Campbell?
Holcombe Ward leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.0 for Oliver Campbell — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ward vs Campbell
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Holcombe Ward above Oliver Campbell: 84.2 vs 84.0. Holcombe Ward leads on Longevity. Oliver Campbell leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WardWinner
84.2Ward wins: Longevity
Campbell
84.0Campbell wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/holcombe-ward-vs-oliver-campbell
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Holcombe Ward
84.2
Ward leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Holcombe Ward
2. Oliver Campbell
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Oliver Campbell5 seasons played · career day 1,826378 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Holcombe Ward5 seasons played · career day 1,824353 titles
-6.6% vs Campbell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ward | 0 | 0 | 55 | 118 | 353 | 562 |
| 🇺🇸 Campbell | 0 | 0 | 60 | 139 | 316 | 423 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ward84.2
Campbell84.0
FAQ
Where does Campbell beat Ward?
Campbell scores higher on peak, dominance. Ward leads on longevity.
How is the Ward vs Campbell score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ward: 84.2, Campbell: 84.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ward vs Campbell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.