Who is better, Holm or Ambers?
Lou Ambers leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.7 for Holly Holm — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Holm vs Ambers
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lou Ambers above Holly Holm: 84.9 vs 84.7. Lou Ambers leads on Statistics. Holly Holm leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AmbersWinner
84.9Ambers wins: Statistics
Holm
84.7Holm wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/holly-holm-vs-lou-ambers
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lou Ambers
84.9
Ambers leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Lou Ambers
2. Holly Holm
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Lou Ambers5 years played · career day 1,826329 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Holly Holm5 years played · career day 1,825298 title wins
-9.4% vs Ambers at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Holm | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 298 | 645 |
| 🇺🇸 Ambers | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 242 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ambers84.9
Holm84.7
FAQ
Where does Holm beat Ambers?
Holm scores higher on longevity. Ambers leads on statistics.
How is the Holm vs Ambers score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Holm: 84.7, Ambers: 84.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Holm vs Ambers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.