AthletesTeams
Sawa vs Fujioka
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Cross-sport verdictgoatrank.world
SawaWinner
86.2Sawa wins: Longevity
Fujioka
85.8Fujioka wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/homare-sawa-vs-naoko-fujioka
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Cross-sport GOAT score
🇯🇵 Homare Sawa
85.9
85.9 in-sport × 1.00 Global participation & competition depth
Sawa leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Homare Sawadepth ×1.00
2. Naoko Fujiokadepth ×0.96
Category breakdown
Season form · season output
Career timeline · season output
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · season output1. 🇯🇵 Naoko Fujioka5 seasons played · career day 1,825372 output
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Homare Sawa5 seasons played · career day 2,55628 output
-92.5% vs Fujioka at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Sawa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 36 |
| 🇯🇵 Fujioka | 0 | 0 | 60 | 128 | 372 | 732 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SawaRetired | FujiokaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Dominance w25% | 83 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 85 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
| International goals | 83 | — |
| International caps | 205 | — |
| World Cups | 1 | — |
| World Cup Golden Ball | 1 | — |
| FIFA World Player awards | 1 | — |
| Asian Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Weight divisions held titles in | — | 5 |
| World titles won | — | 5 |
| Professional wins | — | 20 |
| Title fights | — | 18 |
| Professional years | — | 16 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sawa86.2
Fujioka85.8
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sawa vs Fujioka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.