Who is better, HooXi or Stewie2K?
Stewie2K leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Stewie2K above Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen: 78.6 vs 78.3. Stewie2K leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Stewie2K wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
HooXi wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/hooxi-vs-stewie2k
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Stewie2K leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 HooXi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 6.67 |
| 🇺🇸 Stewie2K | 0 | 0 | 58 | 132 | 394 | 588 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HooXiActive | Stewie2KRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big events won | 5 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 2 | — |
| Seasons as in-game leader | 8 | — |
| Career rating | 0.95 | — |
| Tier-one teams captained | 3 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 3 |
| Big event titles | — | 10 |
| Major finals reached | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Stewie2K leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.3 for Rasmus "HooXi" Nielsen — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
HooXi scores higher on statistics, longevity. Stewie2K leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. HooXi: 78.3, Stewie2K: 78.6.
Make your case for HooXi vs Stewie2K. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.