Who is better, Solo or Neal?
Hope Solo leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Phil Neal — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Solo vs Neal
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Hope Solo and Phil Neal level at 85.8. Hope Solo leads on Statistics, Peak. Phil Neal leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SoloWinner
85.8Solo wins: Peak, Statistics
Neal
85.8Neal wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/hope-solo-vs-phil-neal
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Hope Solo
85.8
Solo leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Hope Solo
2. Phil Neal
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Phil Neal5 seasons played · career day 2,191342 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Hope Solo5 seasons played · career day 1,82640 goals
-88.3% vs Neal at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Solo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 34 | 114 |
| 🏴 Neal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 186 | 600 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Solo85.8
Neal85.8
FAQ
Where does Neal beat Solo?
Neal scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Solo leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Solo vs Neal score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Solo: 85.8, Neal: 85.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Solo vs Neal. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.