Who is better, Long or Gronkowski?
Howie Long leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.1 for Rob Gronkowski — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Howie Long and Rob Gronkowski level at 84.1. Howie Long leads on Longevity. Rob Gronkowski leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Long wins: Longevity
Gronkowski wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/howie-long-vs-rob-gronkowski
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Long leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Long | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 375 | 681 |
| 🇺🇸 Gronkowski | 0 | 0 | 10 | 27 | 54 | 79 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LongRetired | GronkowskiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | 4 |
| Pro Bowl selections | 8 | — |
| Career sacks | 84 | — |
| First-team All-Pro selections | 2 | — |
| Seasons played | 13 | — |
| Pro Bowls | — | 5 |
| All-Pro First Teams | — | 4 |
| Receiving touchdowns | — | 92 |
| Receiving yards | — | 9,286 |
| Single-season TD record (TE) | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Howie Long leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.1 for Rob Gronkowski — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gronkowski scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Long leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Long: 84.1, Gronkowski: 84.1.
Make your case for Long vs Gronkowski. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.