GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bartlett vs Dooland

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BartlettWinner
80.6

Bartlett wins: Peak, Longevity

Dooland
80.6

Dooland wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/hugh-bartlett-vs-bruce-dooland

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett
80.6

Bartlett leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Hit a 57-minute century against the 1938 Australians.

1. Hugh Bartlett
80.6
2. Bruce Dooland
80.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett5 years played · career day 1,825323 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Bruce Dooland5 years played · career day 1,825274 runs
-15.2% vs Bartlett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bartlett0045100323675
🇦🇺 Dooland004087274609

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBartlettRetiredDoolandRetired
First-class runs9,9107,141
First-class centuries16
Fastest century in minutes57
Seasons played16
Highest score175
First-class wickets1,016
Test wickets9
Seasons with 100 wickets4
Ten-wicket matches26
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8076
Honours w20%7274
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bartlett80.6
Dooland80.6
The people
Bartlett
Dooland

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bartlett vs Dooland. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →