Bartlett vs Crawford
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Bartlett wins: Dominance, Longevity
Crawford wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/hugh-bartlett-vs-jack-crawford-cricket
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Bartlett leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Hit a 57-minute century against the 1938 Australians.
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Centuries per year| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bartlett | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 323 | 675 |
| 🇬🇧 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 40 | 130 | 380 | 720 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | BartlettRetired | CrawfordRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 9,910 | 9,488 |
| First-class centuries | 16 | — |
| Fastest century in minutes | 57 | — |
| Seasons played | 16 | — |
| Highest score | 175 | — |
| Tests played | — | 12 |
| Test wickets | — | 39 |
| First-class wickets | — | 1,146 |
| Career years | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bartlett vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.