GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bartlett vs Barnett

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently scores Hugh Bartlett and Kim Barnett level at 80.6. Hugh Bartlett leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. Kim Barnett leads on Longevity, Statistics.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BartlettWinner
80.6

Bartlett wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Barnett
80.6

Barnett wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/hugh-bartlett-vs-kim-barnett

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett
80.6

Bartlett leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Hugh Bartlett
80.6
2. Kim Barnett
80.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Kim Barnett5 years played · career day 2,1916,200 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett5 years played · career day 1,825323 runs
-94.8% vs Barnett at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bartlett0045100323675
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnett0009004,70010,750

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricBartlettRetiredBarnettRetired
First-class runs9,91028,593
First-class centuries1661
Fastest century in minutes57—
Seasons played1626
Highest score175—
Tests played—4
List A runs—12,016
Dominance w25%7672
Peak w20%9084
Longevity w20%8094
Honours w20%7266
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bartlett80.6
Barnett80.6
The people
Bartlett
Barnett

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Bartlett or Barnett?

Hugh Bartlett leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Kim Barnett — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Barnett beat Bartlett?

Barnett scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bartlett leads on peak, dominance, honours.

How is the Bartlett vs Barnett score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bartlett: 80.6, Barnett: 80.6.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bartlett vs Barnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →