Who is better, Bartlett or Lee?
Hugh Bartlett leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.1 for Lizelle Lee — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bartlett vs Lee
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hugh Bartlett above Lizelle Lee: 80.6 vs 80.1. Hugh Bartlett leads on Dominance, Longevity. Lizelle Lee leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BartlettWinner
80.6Bartlett wins: Dominance, Longevity
Lee
80.1Lee wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/hugh-bartlett-vs-lizelle-lee
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett
80.6
Bartlett leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Hugh Bartlett
2. Lizelle Lee
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇿🇦 Lizelle Lee5 years played · career day 1,8251,720 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Hugh Bartlett5 years played · career day 1,825323 runs
-81.2% vs Lee at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bartlett | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 323 | 675 |
| 🇿🇦 Lee | 0 | 0 | 120 | 400 | 1,720 | 3,720 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BartlettRetired | LeeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| First-class runs | 9,910 | — |
| First-class centuries | 16 | — |
| Fastest century in minutes | 57 | — |
| Seasons played | 16 | — |
| Highest score | 175 | — |
| ODI runs | — | 3,011 |
| ODI centuries | — | 5 |
| T20 international runs | — | 1,896 |
| ICC ODI Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| International career years | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bartlett80.6
Lee80.1
FAQ
Where does Lee beat Bartlett?
Lee scores higher on honours. Bartlett leads on dominance, longevity.
How is the Bartlett vs Lee score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bartlett: 80.6, Lee: 80.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bartlett vs Lee. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.