GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hyun vs Samsonov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HyunWinner
79.2

Hyun wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Samsonov
74.5

Samsonov wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/hyun-jung-hwa-vs-samsonov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Hyun Jung-hwa
79.2

Hyun leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World team champion in 1991 with the unified Korean team.

1. Hyun Jung-hwa
79.2
2. Vladimir Samsonov
74.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇧🇾 Vladimir Samsonov5 seasons played · career day 3,28623 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 Hyun Jung-hwa5 seasons played · career day 2,19111 titles
-52.2% vs Samsonov at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇰🇷 Hyun0001920
🇧🇾 Samsonov0000323

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHyunRetiredSamsonovRetired
World team titles1
Olympic medals2
Asian Games golds2
World Championship medals62
World Cup medals2
World Cup titles3
European Championship singles titles3
Olympic appearances6
Best world ranking1
Years at top level30
Dominance w25%7866
Peak w20%8678
Longevity w20%7490
Honours w20%8068
Statistics w15%7872

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hyun79.2
Samsonov74.5
The people
Hyun
Samsonov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hyun vs Samsonov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →