Who is better, Austin or Burge?
Ian Austin leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.9 for Peter Burge — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Austin vs Burge
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ian Austin above Peter Burge: 81.0 vs 80.9. Ian Austin leads on Honours, Longevity. Peter Burge leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AustinWinner
81.0Austin wins: Longevity, Honours
Burge
80.9Burge wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ian-austin-vs-peter-burge
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Ian Austin
81.0
Austin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ian Austin
2. Peter Burge
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Peter Burge5 years played · career day 2,9211,050 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Ian Austin5 years played · career day 1,825294 runs
-72.0% vs Burge at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Austin | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 294 | 610 |
| 🇦🇺 Burge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 120 | 1,310 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Austin81.0
Burge80.9
FAQ
Where does Burge beat Austin?
Burge scores higher on peak, statistics. Austin leads on honours, longevity.
How is the Austin vs Burge score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Austin: 81.0, Burge: 80.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Austin vs Burge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.