GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chappell vs McCullum

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChappellWinner
86.3

Chappell wins: Dominance, Honours

McCullum
86.3

McCullum wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ian-chappell-vs-brendon-mccullum

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Ian Chappell
86.3

Chappell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Rebuilt Australia as captain in the 1970s and never lost a series in charge.

1. Ian Chappell
86.3
2. Brendon McCullum
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇳🇿 Brendon McCullum5 years played · career day 2,921170 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Ian Chappell5 years played · career day 2,92118 runs
-89.4% vs McCullum at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Chappell0000523
🇳🇿 McCullum000056210

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChappellRetiredMcCullumRetired
Test runs5,3456,453
Test centuries14
Tests as captain30
Series won as captain15
Test batting average42.42
Highest Test score302
Fastest Test century (balls)54
ODI runs6,083
Consecutive Tests101
Dominance w25%8682
Peak w20%9096
Longevity w20%8484
Honours w20%8480
Statistics w15%8892

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chappell86.3
McCullum86.3
The people
Chappell
McCullum

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chappell vs McCullum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →