GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chappell vs Bradman

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BradmanWinner
96.8

Bradman wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Chappell
86.3

Chappell wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ian-chappell-vs-don-bradman

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Don Bradman
96.8

Bradman leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. Averaged 99.94 in Tests, the most dominant statistic in team sport.

1. Don Bradman
96.8
2. Ian Chappell
86.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Don Bradman5 years played · career day 2,191505 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Ian Chappell5 years played · career day 2,92118 runs
-96.4% vs Bradman at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Chappell0000523
🇦🇺 Bradman00066395803

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChappellRetiredBradmanRetired
Test runs5,3456,996
Test centuries1429
Tests as captain30
Series won as captain15
Test batting average42.4299.94
Test double centuries12
Ashes series won as captain4
Dominance w25%86100
Peak w20%90100
Longevity w20%8488
Honours w20%8496
Statistics w15%88100

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bradman96.8
Chappell86.3
The people
Chappell
Bradman

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chappell vs Bradman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →