Who is better, iceiceice or Nisha?
iceiceice leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Michał "Nisha" Jankowski — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores iceiceice and Michał "Nisha" Jankowski level at 83.0. iceiceice leads on Longevity. Michał "Nisha" Jankowski leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →iceiceice wins: Longevity
Nisha wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/iceiceice-d2-vs-nisha-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
iceiceice leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇬 iceiceice | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 317 | 658 |
| 🇵🇱 Nisha | 0 | 0 | 66 | 144 | 328 | 738 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | iceiceiceActive | NishaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Premier tournament wins | 8 | — |
| TI appearances | 9 | — |
| TI top-eight finishes | 3 | — |
| Career seasons | 14 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | 2.5 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| Major finals | — | 7 |
| The International appearances | — | 6 |
| Professional seasons | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
iceiceice leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Michał "Nisha" Jankowski — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Nisha scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. iceiceice leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. iceiceice: 83.0, Nisha: 83.0.
Make your case for iceiceice vs Nisha. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.