Who is better, Quartey or Braddock?
Ike Quartey leads with a GOAT score of 81.6 against 81.4 for James J. Braddock — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Quartey vs Braddock
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ike Quartey above James J. Braddock: 81.6 vs 81.4. Ike Quartey leads on Statistics. James J. Braddock leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
QuarteyWinner
81.6Quartey wins: Statistics
Braddock
81.4Braddock wins: Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/ike-quartey-vs-james-j-braddock
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇭 Ike Quartey
81.6
Quartey leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ike Quartey
2. James J. Braddock
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 James J. Braddock5 years played · career day 1,82548 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇭 Ike Quartey5 years played · career day 1,82623 title wins
-52.1% vs Braddock at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇭 Quartey | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 19 | 33 |
| 🇺🇸 Braddock | 0 | 0 | 11 | 23 | 48 | 61 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Quartey81.6
Braddock81.4
FAQ
Where does Braddock beat Quartey?
Braddock scores higher on honours. Quartey leads on statistics.
How is the Quartey vs Braddock score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Quartey: 81.6, Braddock: 81.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Quartey vs Braddock. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.